Showing posts with label wealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wealth. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Hope for Haiti?
Haiti, if I may be so bold, is a lost cause. Some people just haven’t realized it yet.
Despite it currently being quite fashionable I must dissent and say Haiti will likely never, ever get better. I don’t say this simply to be contrarian – I like agreeing with people. I don’t say it because I dislike the Haitian people – I have no strong feelings for them either way. And I certainly don’t say it because I eschew foreign aid – indeed it’s because I so strongly believe in the benefit of foreign aid that I raise the issue. Were international charity and giving a bottomless trough of endless resources, sure, I would say, give to Haiti. They are not, however, and every dollar, euro, or yen spent somewhere is another pound, krone, or ruble not spent somewhere else. In this sense Haiti is more than just a lost cause; it is a black hole of limited resources.
To begin, Haiti’s neighbor: the Dominican Republic. It is poor, underdeveloped, undereducated, underappreciated, and lives with much the same historical legacy of colonialism and corruption that Haiti does. In fact those with more than an American sense of geography will even note they share the same island in the same spot in the middle of the Caribbean. Yet despite their similar weaknesses over the past few decades they’ve both gone in dramatically different directions and now consequentially enjoy dramatically different presents. No one talks about saving the Dominican Republic.
Back to Haiti. Since our actions in the present should be guided at least in part by prospects for the future let us focus on Haiti’s current chances for sustainability. A nation’s economy is not the only indicator or even the best indicator of wellbeing, of course, but an economy – any economy – is an essential part of its foundation for wellbeing. Without some semblance of substantive commerce health, education, development, and consequently happiness are all retarded. In light of this the developing world’s major economic advantage over the developed world, and what will largely allow the developing world to save itself, is its possession of a large, cheap, manual labor force with limited regulation. From this perspective Haiti has got it good. Situated close to the US, the most consumeryist consumer nation on the planet, they arguably have most the third world competitive advantages. Looking closer, however, the advantages are only skin deep for were you to want to do business in Haiti you’d run into some obstacles. To do business in Haiti you’d have to import your raw materials to a port and road system in disrepair using gasoline often in short supply to enable a largely illiterate workforce speaking a language spoken nowhere else using an unreliable electrical supply, an unclean water supply, and an undeveloped healthcare infrastructure to make a product that will be grossly overpriced and once again need shipment via broken roads and inefficient ports to countries that can likely buy the same goods elsewhere cheaper all while negotiating what is considered one of the most corrupt and least law abiding states in the world. And the Dominican Republic’s just right across the border. The end result? It ain’t cheap to do business in Haiti. The cost for us of a “decent” hotel room? $100. The cost of a 4 hour drive between towns? $150 not counting gas. The cost of a meal of goat and plantains and coke? $15. Why then would anyone want to do business with Haiti? How then can Haiti ever be free?
Back to the Dominican Republic. Developing nations have other strengths, however: agriculture, tourism, a tenacious population to name a few. With regards to the DR: yes, yes, yes. With regards to Haiti...? Unfortunately deforestation, soil erosion, and general mismanagement have led to a greater harvest of seasonal mudslides than any appreciable agricultural export. Unfortunately expressionless stares and a foreign tongue in a post-apocalyptic wasteland no matter how tropical don’t do much for tourists when manufactured smiles and a familiar language are right next door. And unfortunately the prevalent brain drain combined with one of the highest birth rates in the Western hemisphere guarantee only an ever increasing population with fewer and fewer capable leaders. Western aid makes up almost two-thirds of the national budget and a large percentage of the economy. This is not sustainable, and when the spigots run dry what will happen? When the population increases but the number of jobs and total arable land remains stagnant what will take place? When another populist election funded entirely by donation comes to pass, who will lead?
I think the most striking aspect of Haiti which makes me give up hope is the thoroughness of its poverty. I have been to a number of poor countries: Mexico, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, India and in all of these places there has been the poor, but there has also been, however small, an upper class and, more importantly, a middle class. There has also been a spectrum of poverty such that there was always the sense that there was at least something better that could potentially be obtained. In Haiti, however, outside the private gated communities of the affluent elite there is only a homogeneous lack. The only class seems to be the lower class. There is undoubtedly some difference between the very poor and the super poor, but it is a difference that if anything only heightens the sense of despair.
Immediately after leaving Haiti I flew to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where I stayed at the Marriot Harbor Beach Resort and Spa to attend a medical conference. It was as big a contrast of wealth and poverty as you can get made all the more striking by the fact that a number of the workers and staff there were Haitian. I attended meetings in overly air conditioned banquet halls, lounged along overly manicured poolsides, and ate and drank more calories than I could ever need to burn. Only a few hundred miles away I had been sweating, working, and living in a whole other world. Perhaps in light of all this excess and wealth any money sent to Haiti, even if used inefficiently or wasted, is worth it. Perhaps when we’re spending thousands on luxury it’s missing the point to argue about the few dollars misspent alleviating poverty. I don’t know, but until Haiti shows promise or my robot heart shows softening I’ll be sending my box tops elsewhere. Polio anyone?
Crippling need aside, here’re photos!
* In case it were not automatically readily clear, these are my opinions and my opinions alone. I don’t know how my travelling companions feel about Haiti. I never asked them. I suppose they’d have nice things to say.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
They're Practically Giving It Away!
It's time to get tough on aid.
Every year the United States hands out billions, probably trillions, of dollars freely to whoever asks for it. Want some cash, Greece? How's $25 billion sound? Need to build something, Morocco? Build a thousand of 'em, here's a million. Got problems, Nepal? Oh yeah don't we all, let's see what forty mill will do for ya. Surprise me. It is a well known fact that the US spends, like, what, at least 10% of our federal budget on foreign aid every year? Maybe even 20 or 30%, I don't know. It's just probably a lot. And what do we get for it? Nothing but nothing. It's time America got what's hers.
That's why I'm happy the GOP presidential candidates are finally standing up for fiscal responsibility. I appreciated it when Rick Perry stated that every year the foreign aid budget would start at $0. And I loved it when Bachmann demanded a song and dance from every ambassador requesting assistance while she would use the ambassador's attache as a foot stool. Gingrich's statement that he would respond to every aid request with, "explain to me why I should give you a single m---- f----- penny," was the kind of frank diplomacy we need in the world. That's always been the whole problem. We just give these guys a blank check, have them fill in the zeros, and then never talk to them again until the following year's aid dispensation party.
It would be one thing if these countries helped us out by, like, assisting with our antiterrorism efforts or making peace deals and cooperating with Israel, or even if doing good deeds like eradicating infectious disease was still it's own reward, but that's not happening and it's not. Pakistan hasn't arrested a single terrorist and I'm pretty sure their army and the Taliban probably totally hang out and watch cricket together on the weekend all the time. Plus as Senator Santorum pointed out, "if we solve all the world's problems then they'll never learn to solve them themselves. As the saying goes: If you give a man a fish he'll eat for a day; if you teach a man to fish he'll eat for a lifetime. And then cripple your domestic fishing industry so we probably shouldn't do that either." Plus it's not like the world's got a monopoly on poverty. I only make $32,000 a year breaking my back, putting in long hours. I don't even take all my sick days! I know as an American what's poor here ain't poor everywhere, but I bet that's not too far from the global average. I imagine I could kick back and watch a game with some dude in Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan while we share a few Buds.
Diplomacy isn't easy, but it ain't rocket science. Until we can get everyone to finally start wearing their "friend" and "enemy" badges liked we've asked -- and get them to stop trading the damn things around -- we should at the very least demand an accounting for our charity. And a return on investment. With a nice letter of thanks. And maybe a gift basket. Containing the hand written thank you notes of children and the drilling rights to offshore oil deposits. Just a small token of appreciation with cash value equal to or greater than that which we have so freely given.
In other news, despite the American public's perception that around 25% of the federal budget goes to foreign aid in fact only about 1% ($37 billion FY 2010) does which is less than the approximately 5% ($185 billion FY 2010) of the federal budget spent annually on national debt interest. Although a little over $1.5 billion went to Egypt last year, $4.2 billion was spent on assistance for refugee populations and $9.8 billion was spent on the President's Global Health Initiative started by former President Bush to help combat HIV and other infectious diseases in developing nations. The median US income in 2007 was $25,076 and placed one in the top 10% of global wage earners. Justin Bieber is set to marry Kim Kardashian in next year's wedding of the century.
Every year the United States hands out billions, probably trillions, of dollars freely to whoever asks for it. Want some cash, Greece? How's $25 billion sound? Need to build something, Morocco? Build a thousand of 'em, here's a million. Got problems, Nepal? Oh yeah don't we all, let's see what forty mill will do for ya. Surprise me. It is a well known fact that the US spends, like, what, at least 10% of our federal budget on foreign aid every year? Maybe even 20 or 30%, I don't know. It's just probably a lot. And what do we get for it? Nothing but nothing. It's time America got what's hers.
That's why I'm happy the GOP presidential candidates are finally standing up for fiscal responsibility. I appreciated it when Rick Perry stated that every year the foreign aid budget would start at $0. And I loved it when Bachmann demanded a song and dance from every ambassador requesting assistance while she would use the ambassador's attache as a foot stool. Gingrich's statement that he would respond to every aid request with, "explain to me why I should give you a single m---- f----- penny," was the kind of frank diplomacy we need in the world. That's always been the whole problem. We just give these guys a blank check, have them fill in the zeros, and then never talk to them again until the following year's aid dispensation party.
It would be one thing if these countries helped us out by, like, assisting with our antiterrorism efforts or making peace deals and cooperating with Israel, or even if doing good deeds like eradicating infectious disease was still it's own reward, but that's not happening and it's not. Pakistan hasn't arrested a single terrorist and I'm pretty sure their army and the Taliban probably totally hang out and watch cricket together on the weekend all the time. Plus as Senator Santorum pointed out, "if we solve all the world's problems then they'll never learn to solve them themselves. As the saying goes: If you give a man a fish he'll eat for a day; if you teach a man to fish he'll eat for a lifetime. And then cripple your domestic fishing industry so we probably shouldn't do that either." Plus it's not like the world's got a monopoly on poverty. I only make $32,000 a year breaking my back, putting in long hours. I don't even take all my sick days! I know as an American what's poor here ain't poor everywhere, but I bet that's not too far from the global average. I imagine I could kick back and watch a game with some dude in Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan while we share a few Buds.
Diplomacy isn't easy, but it ain't rocket science. Until we can get everyone to finally start wearing their "friend" and "enemy" badges liked we've asked -- and get them to stop trading the damn things around -- we should at the very least demand an accounting for our charity. And a return on investment. With a nice letter of thanks. And maybe a gift basket. Containing the hand written thank you notes of children and the drilling rights to offshore oil deposits. Just a small token of appreciation with cash value equal to or greater than that which we have so freely given.
In other news, despite the American public's perception that around 25% of the federal budget goes to foreign aid in fact only about 1% ($37 billion FY 2010) does which is less than the approximately 5% ($185 billion FY 2010) of the federal budget spent annually on national debt interest. Although a little over $1.5 billion went to Egypt last year, $4.2 billion was spent on assistance for refugee populations and $9.8 billion was spent on the President's Global Health Initiative started by former President Bush to help combat HIV and other infectious diseases in developing nations. The median US income in 2007 was $25,076 and placed one in the top 10% of global wage earners. Justin Bieber is set to marry Kim Kardashian in next year's wedding of the century.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)